ONE PARTNER. THREE MODES.

Run. Build. Scale.

Approve once. Deploy continuously. End the Annual Approval Tax.

THE ANNUAL APPROVAL TAX

0 weeks.

The average NZ government IT programme loses 32+ weeks of total momentum to procurement cycles as it traverses from design, to build, to run. The delay isn't technical complexity. It's a fragmented resourcing model.

Budget approved. Procurement delayed.

Funding sits idle while operational teams wait for sequential SOW sign-offs.

Context lost between vendors.

Handing off from strategy to delivery means rebuilding institutional knowledge.

Roadmap stalls, team burns time.

Internal momentum dies in the gaps between contract finalisations.

HOW IT WORKS

One Envelope. Three Deployment Modes.

RUN

Keep the lights on.

Service desk, infrastructure support, managed identity, security operations, 24/7 coverage.

You hand off operational responsibility.

We deliver to service levels.

Commercial: Managed Service Agreement

BUILD

Outcome-based projects.

Cloud migration, network modernisation, security uplift, DR capability builds.

You define the outcome.

We deliver it.

Commercial: SOW via Govt Marketplace

SCALE

Agile resource deployment.

Specialist engineers, project managers, BAs. Backfill for leave. Surge for rollouts.

You own the outcome.

We provide the people, fast.

Commercial: Contractor via AOG TAS

Real programmes move between modes. People and knowledge stay.

Capability Areas

Where the Demand Is. What We Deliver.

New Zealand's government technology pipeline for 2026-2027 is concentrated in five capability areas. Each represents an active programme challenge mapped directly to what Lexel can deliver across our modes.

Modern Data & Integration

API standardisation, data architecture, system integration, and interoperability across agency platforms. Aligned with GCDO's Service Modernisation Roadmap.

Explore Data & Integration

Infrastructure Modernisation

Cloud migration, Azure managed services, networking uplift, and transition support for agencies moving off expiring IaaS/TaaS contracts.

Explore Infrastructure

Workspace Modernisation

Microsoft 365 deployment, Teams and SharePoint adoption, Modern Workplace managed services, and digital employee experience uplift.

Explore Workspace

Application Architecture

Solution design, legacy application uplift, platform migration, and delivery capability for citizen-facing and back-office application programmes.

Explore Applications

Unified Comms & Security

Contact centre modernisation, unified communications delivery, SOC/SIEM capability, and security posture uplift aligned with GCDO assurance requirements.

Explore UC & Security

Map Your FY26 Programme

Talk to us about your current programme commitments. We'll map the capability requirements and deployment modes that fit - no generic pitch, no wasted time.

Talk to Us

How many separate procurement actions will your FY26 roadmap require?

Most agencies don't know. That's the problem.

THE DIFFERENTIATOR

Only Provider on Both Channels.

Government Marketplace

Approved for Managed Services and Professional Services, allowing for seamless SOW execution.

AOG TAS

Approved supplier for rapid contractor recruitment and staff augmentation.

ISO 27001

ISO 9001

ISO 27701

"One approval. Three deployment modes. One accountability point."

Common Questions

Procurement & Delivery FAQ

Does this model align with Government Procurement Rules?

Yes. In fact, it's designed to support the 5th Edition Rules' focus on "Public Value" and "Streamlined Delivery". By consolidating transactional SOWs into an outcome-based partnership, you reduce administrative overhead while maintaining full transparency on rates and deliverables.

Is this a retainer model? Do I pay for unused capacity?

No. You only pay for what you use. The commercial model flexes based on the mode: Managed Services are fixed monthly fees, Projects are milestone-based, and Plan resources are T&M. We simply consolidate the engagement framework so you don't need new contracts to switch between them.

Can a contractor move from 'Plan' to 'Build'?

Absolutely. This is the core benefit. If a specialist engineer (Plan) is needed for a specific project deliverable (Build), we shift them to that work stream. You get continuity of knowledge without having to offboard a contractor and onboard a vendor.

Does this replace our existing Panel Providers?

No, it complements them. Most providers sit on one side - either a recruitment panel focusing on bodies, or SIs focusing on big projects. We sit in the middle, providing the agility to move between individual capability and project outcomes as your programme demands.

THE NEXT STEP

Your FY26 Roadmap Was Approved.

How long will it take to resource it?

Start the Conversation